<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Fooling Around</title>
		<description>Comments for Fooling Around at http://www.classicamiga.com , comment 0 to 3 out of 3 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.classicamiga.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 13:36:07 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.classicamiga.com/content/view/2751/62/#pc_104</link>
			<description>This is very true.  Different people like different things and maybe both of us have been a bit too over critical.  I did enjoy watching this demo because it is technically very impressive for an A500 demo with a lot of content and a large range of effects and different coding techniques which are very well executed and run very nicely on an A500.

For me though a good demo needs to be well produced with a central theme and musical score that both run throughout the whole production.  Instead this is very bitty with each part feeling seperate with nothing linking them together or any common design elements shared between them.  This makes the overall production feel more like a collection of demo routines rather than an interesting visual experience that leads you through a journey from one effect routine to the next. - Harrison</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:44:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.classicamiga.com/content/view/2751/62/#pc_103</link>
			<description>One doesn't always have to agree about a production, as all people have different tastes. Although, I personally think this is quite a good demo. There are several reasons why I like it; The effects are particularly nice for example. The coding is well done, and everything runs smoothly on the Amiga 500. There are many different types of effects as well.

Also, I don't agree 100% about the music. Even if the music isn't as good as in many other demos, I think it's ok.

All in all, I enjoy watching this demo from TSB. :) - P G</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:38:30 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.classicamiga.com/content/view/2751/62/#pc_102</link>
			<description>I was perhaps too critical, but I thought FX stood for sound FX, that's because I only gave it a 2. If something else is meant, I can still rectify that point. 

EDIT:I just corrected this a bit, and also gave the music a 3 instead of a 2. As FX does not stand for audio FX, it did merit more than just a lousy 2 ;-) - Demon Cleaner</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:45:51 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
